Thursday, November 5, 2015

Now You're the Senator (kinda)

Mock Senate
Scenario:  You have been elected as Senators from across the United States to serve in the Senate of the United States.  Your job will be to represent your state and your party in drafting legislation which will be important to the United States. 
Some of you have been elected to leadership positions.  Your jobs include drafting legislation while also setting agendas and working the votes. 

Each party member will be responsible for drafting one legislative bill or constitutional amendment to be presented to your committee (a single spaced typed page). The draft should be in outline form using the template provided. Each outline should be typed and no more than one page in length. Legislation should reflect the political and regional interests of the author and must be your own idea (look at actual legislation your real life Senator has sponsored or co-sponsored in the last two years for influence). It can be related to actual historical legislation, but you will need to demonstrate that you have included new, creative ideas if you take this route. Another option is to write new legislation that never occurred in reality. If you decide to do this, make sure your idea plausible. You can certainly win creativity points if you’re clever, but will suffer if you’re foolish.
As a committee, you will review each piece of legislation brought forth by your committee members.  As a committee you must decide to kill or report the bill. If the committee decides to report it, they send the revised bill to the Senate floor (all of us together).  Each committee may choose 2 bills to report.  Make sure you work out the details which include how the proposed idea will be funded, who will implement it and how its effectiveness will be rated.  In addition your group will need to present the bill draft to the entire Senate.  After bill introductions, the Senate will debate the bill and finally come to a vote on each bill introduced!
Mock Senate Operations: The mock senate will be only as effective as the level of cooperation exuded by the leadership and party members. I encourage you to be animated and enthusiastic. Dress the part if you wish.
Operational Guidelines:
1. The legislative docket will be written on the white board
2. Sessions will begin with a call to order.
3. Introductions of legislative measures will be controlled by the party leadership. For educational purposes, we will introduce bills for debate from both parties. To simulate the majority party’s dominance, the docket will follow this order…
O Majority Legislation
O Majority Legislation
O Minority Legislation
O Majority Legislation
O Minority Legislation
O Independent/Third Party Legislation

4. Members introducing a bill will be allotted 2 minutes to present the merits of the bill. The bill’s author will read his one page speech. The opposition party will then be allotted 2 minutes for rebuttal. The person assigned to write a rebuttal for that bill will then read his speech.
5. Debate on each bill continues with 1 minute per speaker (as determined by the President Pro Temp) until a motion is made to “call the question” (motions covered later).  Unused time may be used to 1) take a question from another member (either party), 2) may be yielded to another speaker (of the same party), or 3) yielded back to the Speaker.
6. Party leaders may call for a “party caucus” (short recess) at any point during the session.  Time will be allotted at the discretion of the Speaker.
7. Debate will be closed upon a successful motion to “call the question”.
8. Legislative action requires a majority vote, with the exception of constitutional amendments, which require 2/3 approval (absent members will not be counted).
9. Upon approval or rejection of a given legislative measure, another item shall be called from the docket.

Parliamentary Motions:
Our mock congress will employ strict protocol for legislative procedure.  Congeniality among the membership shall be preserved through the following parliamentary procedures:
Motion to Consider: this motion moves legislation from the docket to the floor for debate.
Motion to Call the Question: this motion ends debate and brings the issue up for a vote.
Motion to Table: this motion tables an item, moves it aside for another matter to be considered.
Motion to Recall from the Table: this motion brings a bill back from the table for continued debate.
Motion to Amend: this motion amends the present item under consideration.  The author (or initial presenter of a bill) may accept an amendment as a “friendly amendment” without a vote.  If not deemed friendly, a majority vote is needed to change the item.
Motion to Adjourn: this motion ends the session (must be sanctioned by the Speaker).
* Note: all motions require a “second” - approval from another member.  The Speaker will guide parliamentary action as needed.

Strategy Considerations: Be sure to follow historical consistency when drafting legislative outlines, yet debates can consider wider questions and issues as appropriate.  Of course, consider time constraints when handling substantive issues.  All members need to be organized and fluent in the procedures outlined above.  Leaders serve at the pleasure of the membership and must retain their confidence throughout the congress or they can be replaced.  Don’t discount dealing with members of the other party or even lobbying the President pro tempore.    Address him as "Mr. President” and others members in a professional manner such as “Senator (last name)” or “the distinguished gentleman from (indicate state)”.  Above all, be persuasive and congenial and serve your constituents and your country with honor.



Grading:
1. Quality of the proposed legislation
a. Does it fit your role?
b. Did you put effort into thinking it through?
c. Are your responses on the legislative template thorough and well written?
2. Quality of the speech
a. Is it a full page?
b. Does it address the issues?
c. Is it well written, persuasive?
3. Participation     This is paramount if you wish to receive a good grade
a. Are your responses/voting record in line with your role?

b. Are you an active participant in the debates?

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Congressional Powers and Procedures

To help you prepare for our mock Senate, and to aide you in your understanding of how Congress works (or should work) I have a selection of videos for you. So grab your book, your notes, and some popcorn and enjoy.

Congress and Elections


Congress and Committees (the nuts and bolts of how Congress works)


Congress and Leadership (Don't let the power go to your head)


I'm Just a Bill!


Congress and Making Laws


Congress and the Question of WHY?

Wednesday, October 7, 2015

Living Room Candidate

Today you will be watcing and analysizing campaign commercials in a variety of ways. The videos can be found on my teacher page on the Cleburne High School webpage, under videos - here is a direct link
http://chs.cleburne.k12.tx.us/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=375276&type=u&pREC_ID=video

Can also get there by going to www.cleburne.k12.tx.us then schools, click Cleburne High School, then Academics, Teacher and Staff, search Moulden, then the Video link/tab

Link is also on Twitter

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Socratic Seminar Prep

For your Socratic Seminar on Thursday, you need to develop 10 questions, that are 'document' based to help guide the discussion of the following 'Big Question'
Does the Mass Media make us a more informed voter or more divided?
Use the 2 articles - Does the Mass Media Divide Us and Strange Bedfellows, along with the following clips

Clip #1: John Stewart on Crossfire


Clip #2: SNL Coverage of Bush/Gore Debate in 2000

Thursday, September 10, 2015

You Asked, I Provide

You asked for it, I created it.
Below is a link to the class calendar for the next three weeks, due know things are subject to change (and likely will).

CLASS CALENDAR

Friday, September 4, 2015

Federalism on Trial

For Federalism we will be running a moot court looking at two of the first Federalism cases that went before the Supreme Court - Gibbons v Ogden and McCulloch v Maryland

For our Moot Court, you will take on the role of either a lawyer, interest group, or Supreme Court Justice. Details of the project are also listed below ...

Gibbons v. Ogden and McCulloch v. Maryland
A moot court is a role play of an appeals court or Supreme Court hearing. The court, composed of a panel of justices, is asked to rule on a lower court’s decision. No witnesses are called. Nor are the basic facts in a case disputed. Arguments are prepared and presented on a legal question (i.e. the constitutionality of a low or government action). Since moot courts are not concerned with the credibility of witnesses, they are an effective strategy for focusing attention on the underlying principles and concepts of justice. Please note: you will be graded for both your preparation and participation. Good luck!


Roles:

All students:
  1. Visit the websites for the cases your are assigned (Justices are assigned both)
    1. McCulloch v Maryland
    2. Gibbons v Ogden


  1. Answer the following questions ...
    1. What happened in this case?
    2. Who are the people/organizations involved?
    3. How did the lower court rule on this case?
    4. Who is the petitioner and the respondent?
    5. Identify the constitutional issue(s) involved in the case.
    6. What are the arguments in favor of the petitioner (first person listed)? Against? (These may overlap )
    7. What are the arguments in favor of the respondent (second person listed)? Against?
Justices:
  1. After you have completed the above questions, read both the summary of the opinion and the excerpts from the opinion for both Gibbons and McCulloch:
  2. When you’ve read all of the material, you should write at least 5 questions to ask EACH side (petitioners and respondents) from EACH case that they need answered in order to reach a decision. This is important – how prepared you are can greatly affect the Moot Court. These questions are due at the beginning of class, on the day of the moot court.
  3. Tips:
    1. Prepare questions – not speeches – for both sides
    2. Consider how a ruling in the case might affect other cases – ask hypotheticals
    3. Remember that the lawyers mostly have the material you’ve seen – don’t ask about the ‘record below’ or about precedents not in the materials you’ve received.
Lawyers:
  1. After you have completed the above questions together, read the syllabus (an excellent summary of the case) and opinions on the Cornell Law Website. Discuss the key aspects of the case, the related constitutional phrases, and choose the most convincing arguments to include in your arguments.
  2. Writing your arguments (Due the day of the Moot Court)
    1. Lawyer 1: Opens the arguments. Have a strong opening sentence or two. Right away, state your main point, with a clear and convincing argument. (One sentence: main point’ next two sentences: explanation of why your point is correct; next four to five sentences: precedents and how they connect to your main point) You want to have enough material to explain your arguments for 7 minutes.
    2. Lawyer 2: Responds to the key arguments from the respondent. Begin by explaining that the Respondent is wrong. Then list your most convincing argument why this is true. Then explain it. Then, list another argument and explanation. You will be able to add to this section as the respondent lays out their argument to the Court. You want to have enough material to explain your arguments for 5 minutes.
  3. Tips:
    1. You first words: “Mr./Mrs. Chief Justice and may it please the Court. My name is ______ and I represent ______ in this case.”
    2. Answer questions briefly and directly.
    3. Try to help the Justices figure out a way to decide the case your way. Don’t fight them.
Interest Groups

  1. After you have complete the above questions for the case you were assigned, you will begin to develop what are called amicus curiae – a brief for a certain side of a Supreme Court case written by a special interest group or party.
  2. You need to decide what special interest group would want to be involved (are you for civil liberties like the ACLU or minority rights like the NCAAP or gun rights like the NRA) for the case you were assigned. You will then need to write amicus curiae brief to the Court, telling the Justices who you are, your connection to the case, and why the Justices should side with the side you want to win. See the Lawyer tips for things to consider in writing your brief.
Are you wondering what role you will be playing in our Moot Court, well find your class and name below ...

4th Period


Ogden Lawyers Gibbons Lawyers Supreme Court Justices
Sarah Garrett Myah
Rebekah Kendyl Jordan
Brett Jared Luis
Ogden Interest Groups Gibbons Interest Groups Natalie
Morgan Mallory Ryan
Lane Cassidy
Adam
McCulloch Lawyers Maryland Lawyers
Preslie Taylor
Rachel Zach
David Kylie
McCulloch Interest Groups Maryland Interest Groups
Fernando Dylan
Raquel Jesus
Amber Colton

6th Period


Ogden Lawyers Gibbons Lawyers Supreme Court Justices
Ali Jasmin Kathine
Pricila Brandon Madison
Jorge
Ogden Interest Groups Gibbons Interest Groups
Blake Reagan
Jarett Stephanie
McCulloch Lawyers Maryland Lawyers
Nicholas Victoria
Nicolas Daniella
McCulloch Interest Groups Maryland Interest Groups
Miranda Pedro
Reygan Timothy

8th Period


Ogden Lawyers Gibbons Lawyers Supreme Court Justices
Kenna Madison Hannah
Mon'tee Alex Hannah
Malachi Vincent Adrianna
Ogden Interest Groups Gibbons Interest Groups Ian
London Joley Jesus
Reagan Kennedy
McCulloch Lawyers Maryland Lawyers
Megan Melanie
Argelis Caleb
Erin Kendell
McCulloch Interest Groups Maryland Interest Groups
Victoria Chadra
Brittany JP
Bailey Hunter

Friday, August 28, 2015

Helpful Items

Along with posting major assignments and links to needed documents, I will also use this space to help you find useful items for study and understanding.

Below you will find useful videos for Unit 1, sometimes these are required viewing (you will have some assignment to go along with them then) and sometimes they are highly suggested viewing. This first set comes to you from Crash Course, yes the Crash Course of John Green fame - but alas no John Green for Government. They are still very informative and funny, so we will use them.

Enjoy

This first video is an introduction to the host and the course as well.




Now starts the heavier lifting - below you will find a video on the Bicameral Congress and then on the Separation of Powers, both very good viewing for understanding Ch. 2.